banner: fairpress.org, Citizens Coalition for Responsible Media, fighting media bias
Outrage Archive

Home
Media Bias Outrage/Week
Outrage of the Month
Outrage Archive
On The Offensive
On The Offensive Archive
Hot Topic Links
Special Features
Activism
Press Releases
Rolodex
Activist Handbook
Thread Archive
Identify Media Bias
Mission Statement
Guestbook
Contact Us

Free Republic Network button

Hey, CNN: Answer These Six Questions!

10/22/2001
Brace yourselves, media bias fighters. This is undoubtedly the most hideous media bias outrage yet discussed on fairpress.org. The news organization formerly known as the Clinton News Network can now be referred to more correctly at the Criminal News Network. They have managed to arrange an "interview" with the evil one, Osama bin Laden.

In announcing this "coup" on Tuesday, 10/16/2001, Wolf Blitzer attempted to rationalize the network's thinking:

"Someone claiming to represent al Qaeda has asked Al Jazeera and CNN to submit written questions for Osama bin Laden - questions they say bin Laden will answer on video tape and send back to Al Jazeera. This proposal came in to Al Jazeera, which then notified CNN.

CNN has some questions we would like to put to Osama bin Laden, but first we want to be absolutely clear about this process:

  • We want to stress that CNN has no information about where bin Laden is or whether he is alive or dead.
  • We do not know how al Qaeda communicates with Al Jazeera or how Al Jazeera plans to get the questions to bin Laden.
  • We agree to no prohibitions or preconditions from Osama bin Laden's organization or from the Al Jazeera television channel.
  • By submitting our questions, we are making no commitment to air bin Laden's response. We will look at the tape, if there is a tape, and decide how much or how little to run. If we believe his comments are not newsworthy, we will not run any of them.
  • We claim no exclusivity over this tape, and we will allow other news organizations to make their own judgments on how to use bin Laden's answers."

Here are CNN's six questions:

  1. Your spokesman has praised the September 11 terrorist attacks that killed thousands of innocent people and threatened to carry out more attacks involving planes and tall buildings. How can you and your followers advocate the killing of innocent people?
  2. What was your role and the role of the al Qaeda organization in the September 11 attacks?
  3. What was your role and the role of your organization in the subsequent anthrax attacks in the United States?
  4. Did any of the September 11 hijackers of their accomplices receive al Qaeda financial support or training at al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, and was any other government or organization involved?
  5. In the past, you called on you followers to acquire weapons of mass destruction-nuclear, chemical and bioiological weapons. Do you or your followers have any such weapons and, if so, will those weapons be used?
  6. The vast majority of Muslim and Arab leaders, including Muslin clerics and Palestinian authority leader Yasser Arafat, say there is no justification in Islam for the terrorist attacks you advocate. They have denounced you, your followers, and your self-declared holy war. How do you respond to their criticism?

The CNN web site states, "We have no idea if bin Laden will answer these questions, and we intend to run only what we think is newsworthy. We will report back to you as this process unfolds."

Media bias activists would be very surprised if CNN did not find some way to declare a large portion of this so-called interview "newsworthy". It's only a question of how low they will go to increase their Neillson ratings.

Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center has issued a furious press release with six questions of his own for CNN.

  1. Knowing that terrorists thrive on media exposure to spread their propaganda, and that the interview was instigated by al Qaeda, why would you allow your international network to be used by a wanted terrorist and known killer?
  2. Have you sought assurances from the government of the United States that this endeavor will not in any way jeopardize the war against terrorism or cause further loss of life?
  3. Given that bin Laden is a liar - he first denied having anything to do with the terrorist attacks on the U.S. - why do you think he will be honest with CNN?
  4. Will you independently verify bin Laden's statements before you put them on the air?
  5. If CNN had existed 60 years ago would it have interviewed and aired comments from Emperor Hirohito, the man who ordered the attack on Pearl Harbor?
  6. If CNN had existed 60 years ago, would it have given a forum to Adolf Hitler to explain his hatred of Jews and Christians?

The MRC CyberAlert for 10/18/2001 concluded its item on this outrage with this statement: "I'm pretty confident CNN has a much better chance of getting Osama bin Laden to answer its questions then the MRC has of having CNN address ours."

Well, then! I suggest we bury CNN in e-mail and letters demanding that they answer Bozell's very astute questions.

CNN
P.O. Box 105366
One CNN Center
Atlanta, Georgia 30348
Phone 404-827-1500
FAX 404-681-6363

CNN Feedback

Washington Bureau:
820 First Street NE, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20002
Phone 202-898-7900
FAX 202-898-7923

Owner of CNN:
AOL TimeWarner
75 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10019
Phone 212-484-8000

Read more here:

Newsmax.com: CNN Getting bin Laden 'Interview'
CNN's Version

Ed. Note: Although CNN & AOL TimeWarner officials came out with an insultingly wrong-headed policy about "terrorists" being called "alleged terrorists", the Media Research Center's analysis shows that on-air personnel never complied with that policy and it has since been rescinded. Unfortunately, this tale has now reached the level of an urban legend with many people still believing this is CNN's policy. I urge all media bias activists who respond to the above "outrage" not to drag unsubstantiated rumors into your letters and e-mails to CNN. Also, I will remind everyone that it was Reuters who referred to terrorists as "freedom fighters", not CNN. You may wish to read to the following to reassure yourselves that this is correct.

MRC CyberAlert 10/01/2001, CNN "Terrorist" Update
MRC CyberAlert 09/28/2001, CNN's "Alleged Terrorists"
MRC CyberAlert 09/25/2001, No "Terrorists" at Reuters



When you feel your personal media bias tolerance gauge rising into the red zone, don't throw stuff at the TV screen! Send your suggestion to outrage@fairpress.org! Each week, one hideous example of media bias will be selected for closer examination. Hmmmmmm . . .

Click to read the current
Media Bias Outrage of the Week